Physical examination maneuver

Physical Exam

Digital Rectal Exam

🔒
Subscribe to view — from $5/moSign in to watchAlready a subscriber? Videos are for subscribers. Subscriptions are not available in the app.At a school or residency?

How to Perform

With the patient standing and the buttocks and perianal area exposed, position the feet apart with the hips flexed and the forearms supported on the examination table. Inspect the perianal skin, anus, and perineum. Lubricate a gloved index finger, place the fingertip against the anus, and ask the patient to relax while gently advancing the finger toward the umbilicus. Assess resting sphincter tone, then sweep the finger circumferentially along the rectal walls, noting any masses or tenderness. In men, palpate the prostate for size, contour, consistency, tenderness, and nodules. As the finger is withdrawn, note any stool or blood on the glove.

How to Interpret

Showing 3 of 9 findings

Cauda Equina Syndrome

Reduced resting anal sphincter tone
Rule in
InconclusiveWide CI
Rule out
Not helpful
Evidence:Strong

Prostate Cancer

Abnormal prostate on palpation
Rule in
Somewhat helpfulNo CI
Rule out
Minimally helpfulNo CI
Evidence:Moderate

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Melena on the examining glove
Rule in
Very helpful
Rule out
Minimally helpful
Evidence:Moderate

References

  • Jones D, Friend C, Dreher A, Allgar V, Macleod U. The diagnostic test accuracy of rectal examination for prostate cancer diagnosis in symptomatic patients: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):79. doi:10.1186/s12875-018-0765-y. PMID: 29859531. PMCID: PMC5985061.
  • Dionne N, Adefolarin A, Kunzelman D, Trehan N, Finucane L, Levesque L, Walton DM, Sadi J. What is the diagnostic accuracy of red flags related to cauda equina syndrome (CES), when compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)? A systematic review. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;42:125-133. doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2019.05.004. PMID 31132655. Corrigenda: Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;43:128, PMID: 31300389; Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021;53:102355, doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102355.
  • Takada T, Nishiwaki H, Yamamoto Y, Noguchi Y, Fukuma S, Yamazaki S, Fukuhara S. The Role of Digital Rectal Examination for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0136996. PMID: 26332867.
  • Dixon JM, Elton RA, Rainey JB, Macleod DA. Rectal examination in patients with pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. BMJ. 1991;302(6773):386-388. PMID: 2004144.
  • Srygley FD, et al. Does this patient have a severe upper gastrointestinal bleed? JAMA. 2012;307(10):1072-1079. PMID: 22416103.
  • Smith RG, Lewis S. The relationship between digital rectal examination and abdominal radiographs in elderly patients. Age Ageing. 1990;19(2):142-143. PMID: 2337011.
  • Grucela A, Salinas H, Khaitov S, Steinhagen RM, Gorfine SR, Chessin DB. Prospective analysis of clinician accuracy in the diagnosis of benign anal pathology: comparison across specialties and years of experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(1):47-52. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181bbfc89. PMID: 20010350.
  • Bickley LS, Szilagyi PG, Hoffman RM, Soriano RP. Bates' Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. 13th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
  • Swartz MH. Textbook of Physical Diagnosis: History and Examination. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2025.

Research last updated September 10, 2026.